An AI-driven decision-support timeline for syndicated-loan finance - turning deal activity into decisions, with an agent that acts on them.
Try the Live Demo (opens in a new tab)A real fintech client - syndicated-loan, cross-organizational deal operations.
Product Designer - domain research, UX strategy, and end-to-end UI design.
The decision-support timeline - my design end to end, from research to hi-fi UI.
Deals don’t slow down because of decisions. They slow down when no one knows what’s missing - or who owns it.
On a syndicated-loan fintech platform for cross-organizational trading data, teams couldn’t answer one question: where does the deal stand? Management asked for confidence and transparency - that brief became the timeline.
Standard is T+7 · 2024 average ≈ 16 days
only ~29% settle within a week
Visibility alone doesn’t solve the problem
No tool combines Gantt-grade planning UX with loan-market semantics - that became the design opportunity.
The market’s servicing backbone - used by 21 of the top 25 syndicated lenders.
Industry-backed real-time agent-data platform (J.P. Morgan, BofA, Citi).
The market-standard platform for settling syndicated loan trades between institutions.
I evaluated each role through 4 lenses:
Each role has unique needs within the transaction. One requires full control over deal progress, another prioritizes certainty in terms and commitments, a third focuses on regulation and risk, while the last demands full transparency in financing and financial conditions.
Designed around the Transaction Manager - the role that owns execution across banks, legal and compliance - with tailored views for underwriters, compliance officers and bankers.
Each role contributes tasks and approvals.
The timeline connects everything into one coordinated system.
The object model behind the timeline (OOUX): phases, tasks, documents and signatures as connected objects.
A deal is months of dependent work under deadlines - exactly what a Gantt shows best. I built the solution as a Gantt: phases, dependencies and risks on a single time axis. No market tool offers this view.
Structure the process.
Every role works on the same shared time axis.
Highlight what needs attention and suggest next steps with AI.
AI identifies blockers that require action.
Predicted risks help teams act before delays happen.
Flat task list. Rejected: months of deal work became an endless scroll; no sense of phase or progress.
Alerts in a separate panel. Rejected: problems lost their time context; users had to map each alert back to the timeline themselves.
Every decision below began as one of those explorations.
Considered: a flat task list - familiar, zero learning curve.
Considered: a separate alerts panel - a cleaner Gantt.
Considered: exposing every action and field - more discoverable.
I mapped the agent’s autonomy to its confidence - human-in-the-loop by design: it proposes when sure, steps back when unsure, and automates only what you approved in advance. Calibrated trust.
The result: it earns trust one rung at a time, and never acts where you can’t see it or stop it.
The agent proposes a complete action.
The agent steps back and stays honest.
Good design respects how each role works - not averaging everyone into one “user”.
I learned to break a high-stakes, unfamiliar domain into small steps I could verify.
The biggest lesson: teams don’t need more information - they need to know what to act on.